We see no problem with this.
Mar. 2nd, 2008 11:27 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
"Your life won't be complete until every woman you know has fallen in love with the Doctor to the exclusion of all other males."
"Oh give me a little credit. My life has a clearly defined moment when I will have gained all I desire! Very few people really know when their lives will be complete."
"Yes, but then the space age clockworks come and take your brain to be their ship computer."
"And then I'll live forever!"
"Oh give me a little credit. My life has a clearly defined moment when I will have gained all I desire! Very few people really know when their lives will be complete."
"Yes, but then the space age clockworks come and take your brain to be their ship computer."
"And then I'll live forever!"
no subject
Date: 2008-03-03 07:40 am (UTC)And they are then, at the appointed time, to all simultaneously think "I LOVE THE DOCTOR", and the outpouring of angsty fan-girl energy (which you are clearly a nexus) will make you an all-powerful god.
C'mon Frannie, be a bit more creative in your nefarious plots.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-03 07:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-03 07:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-03 07:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-03 07:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-04 01:17 pm (UTC)Also, we don't know anything about the maturation process. Is the age of majority proportional to lifespan, or do they simply have much shorter childhoods? (I don't know how Elves and Dwarves work in Tolkien, as examples of other longevitous beings, but Hobbits seem to split the difference with the age of majority at 33 and extended teenage years - Pippin is such a spoiled rich kid).
So the long and the short of it is, depending on how we think timelords (or whatever she is) mature, I could put Susan anywhere from 15 to maybe 30 or 40.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 03:18 am (UTC)(Still, it seems weird to me to have Time Lord childhoods so very small compared to their lifetimes.)
Someone told me the Doctor was 236 when he stole the TARDIS.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 03:58 am (UTC)Numbers are given...occasionally. Tomb of the Cybermen gets you 450. The Ribos Operation (I think) gives another number somewhere in the mid 700s, although the Doctor's and Romana's counts differ by...three years, I think. They get into a fight. I think it's somewhere in Trial of a Timelord that the number 900 comes up, and in Time and the Rani (the first 7th Doctor episode) it is mentioned that he and the Rani are the same age, which happens to be...936, I think. Something in there.
Of course, it's still Doctor Who, so Pertwee has lines like "Yes I'm a scientist! And I have been for many thousands of- well, for a very long time!" If he meant to say "years" in there, he's just...wrong. But there is otherwise a fairly good linear mapping.
Which means the tenth doctor should be in his mid 1300s or so.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 05:27 am (UTC)Now, these days he's claiming to be 903, so one wonders if he's using a different scale. When he said 450, he said "as you humans measure things" or something like that. One also wonders whether he is just lying about his age.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-06 08:41 pm (UTC)Yeah, he might be lying or forgetful.
903 is a sloppy number. They explicitly give a larger number in Time and the Rani (though I don't recall what it was) and that was 3 full Doctors ago. Shame on the new show. They're just as inconsistent as the old show!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-06 11:56 pm (UTC)Now, in the first new season, he said "900 years of phone box travel" which would have put the age at over 1100. But since then he has specifically said "903 years old" so we're a little bit frustrated.
The consensus seems to be that it's funnier to say he's lying about his age cause he doesn't want to admit he's passed the big one-oh-oh-oh. (I have that wallpaper on one of the computers here at school.)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-03 07:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-03 07:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-04 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-04 01:23 pm (UTC)I TAKE PERVERSE JOY IN THWARTING THE EVENTUAL COMPLETION OF YOUR LIFE!!!!
Also, even among the beard-haters --- you're competing with Wash. It'll never happen. (Sorry)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 03:25 am (UTC)And we have further evidence that I am attacted to men who are overgrown kids. Wash cannot compete in this simply because anything Wash can do, the Doctor can do with more awesome. With the sole exception of Zoe.
We can make jokes about my supposed Gandalf obsessions elsewhere.
And you might be amazed by the long, drawn out, detailed joking conversations involving the Doctor and beards I have encountered....
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 04:11 am (UTC)"Wash cannot compete in this simply because anything Wash can do, the Doctor can do with more awesome. With the sole exception of Zoe."<\i>
Important exception there! And as for the rest...I disagree! although we have left the realm where logical arguments are useful. But I will stand by my belief that SPOILAR! even pinned to a chair Wash is ten times hotter than all the Doctors put together. So there!
Although I am willing to admit that Wash with mustache was just silly.
Nevertheless, steadfastly I proclaim, in order of love of males:
Joel-Henry > Wash > ... > the Doctor
AND NONE SHALL SWAY ME! you'll just have to die unfulfilled.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 04:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 04:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 05:21 am (UTC)And of course that's part of the reason a large section of the fangirls are more interested in the Master than the Doctor. One of them has an icon that says "Beardy Masters appreciation society"
*goes digging* Aha! ...hmm, maybe I shouldn't show you that conversation...
So instead, obsessive speculation about Zimbardo (http://community.livejournal.com/ihasatardis/935569.html#cutid1)